Skip to main content

The Mind Lab by Unitec: Flipped Preparation for Week 2


A self-assessment of my 5 Key Competencies in my teaching and leadership practice. What are my strengths and weaknesses?

See here for a google doc




TED talk "What 60 Schools Can Tell Us About Teaching 21st Century Skill"
My reflections on how 20th century and 21st-century skills differ? Do we need both?
The main takeaway for me is the message that ‘change can be hard’. Schools are risk averse - the downsides are greater than the upsides to taking a risk. I feel that this may apply more to American schools than NZ ones, but we definitely suffer from inertia, the feeling that ‘that is just the way it is done’.


But solutions to the problems we have do exist. These solutions exist in individual schools. Grant Lichtman states that although change seems hard, it is just uncomfortable. We are trying to fit the Victorian model of pedagogy into a 21st century ecosystem, and finding it won’t fit. We need to change our systems from the bottom up.
Anchors that stop us changing...
  1. Ego. This is my classroom, my subject, my time
  2. Dams - We content rather than context. Especially in post-primary, we split kids into packets
  3. Silos around ourselves - they stop us collaborating and communicating. We are inwardly focused

Cognitosphere. This is a neural network that our students will have to compete in. Most of the world now has access to the World Wide web through their cell phones.

To prepare our children for 21st-century challenges
  1. Teach into the unknown.
  2. Teach children to be self-evolving learners.
  3. We need to become self-evolving organisations. We need to be comfortable with constant change and the methodology of constant change


Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 26 - Reflect on Your Inquiry (Take Action)

Step 1 (What): Describe something that is significant and has happened during your Inquiry so far A significant event that has occurred so far in my inquiry has been the results from some of the interviews that I conducted in week 2. My initial suspicion going into the inquiry was that the children in my class would show quite low engagement in maths. This suspicion was based on my observations of previous year 6 classes I have taught as well as interviews I conducted with a random sample of year 5s at the end of last year. The significant event was that generally speaking, the children I interviewed did not show particularly low engagement in maths. There was quite a large variation in the data produced which I will cover below, but generally speaking, children in the class seem to have more positive attitudes towards maths than in previous years. Step 2 (So What): Evaluate the most interesting/important/useful aspects of this event This finding surprised me. However, after referri...
2 comments
Read more

Week 32 - Reflect on your learning journey (Check)

Stage 1: Problem identification In the first week of the programme, I wrote down my goals in the Personal Learning Outcome form. My goals were: 1. To better motivate my technology crazy boys 2. To learn how to better prepare my students for a 21st-century workplace 3. To learn new teaching techniques and skills The boys in my class this year are not nearly as technology crazy, but the other two points are definitely still relevant. We have had a lot of professional development at our school stressing how the educational needs of children graduating high school in the 2020's (our students) will be completely different from our own schooling. An example of this is provided by Mark Osbourne in his 2014 essay titled "Inviting Innovation". He wrote that "it is clear is that while “industrial-model” thinking may have served schools well during the industrial age, the 21st century requires a much more innovative, entrepreneurial approach".   In order to prepare...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 31 - Evaluate Your Impacts (Check)

Step 1: What is the observed impact after the ‘Take Action’ phase? As I detailed in last weeks blog post, the result of my pre and post number knowledge testing shows a significant increase in number knowledge when comparing children at the beginning of the year to week 7. However, I think it may be a bit rash to claim that this is entirely down to the application of gamification principles to my class program. I will detail why this is below. In terms of the qualitative interview data I gathered, a number of themes became apparent. Generally, students enjoyed the gamification aspects of the program. One boy stated, "I like the way I can get money for practising my times tables, it makes me want to do it". There did however seem to be a bit of a disconnect between children's mastery of basic number facts, and how readily they use them to solve problems. Step 2: How is the observed impact different from or similar to the anticipated one? As a school, we are having a focus ...
Post a Comment
Read more