Skip to main content

Week 6 leadership

Flipped preparation:

Flipped preparation (required): Watch the video 'Leadership Theories and Styles', then identify a change initiative that you have been involved with, where you contributed to leadership or followership. Create a diagram that links your experiences to one or more specific leadership theories, with some explanation of these links



Leadership Assessment 1
In part 1 of your LEADERSHIP 1 assessment you'll need to write (either individually, or in groups of two or three) a cohesive essay where you critically analyse the leadership of a change initiative that you were involved with in the past. Identify the leadership theories, styles and attributes used and evaluate their effectiveness. You can choose the leadership theories freely, they just have to be ones that are recognised in research literature.
You then plan your leadership of a future digital and collaborative change initiative. Indicate how insights gained from reflecting on the past initiative have influenced your plan for leading the future initiative. Remember that the focus of the plan is your leadership - not the initiative itself.
Leadership Theories
As time has progressed a number of leadership theories have emerged which deal with various styles and methodologies about leadership. These theories could be labelled in four broad headings; namely the Trait theories, Behavioral theories, Contingency theories and the Power and Influence theories. In 1922, Max Weber (see Weber, 1978) identified three kinds of leader/follower relations; traditional, bureaucratic and charismatic. He also noted that they occur in combination, and there may be gradual transitions between these types. Since then, much has been written about types of leadership. Some examples of leadership theories relevant to education include
  • Transactional
  • Transformational
  • Pedagogical
  • Distributed
  • Servant (Agile)
  • Tū Rangatira
  • Situational
Burns (1978) outlined the original ideas for both transactional and transformational leadership. He stated that both are 'moral' forms of leadership, as opposed to 'amoral' power-wielding.
Bass & Riggio (2006) developed their transformational leadership theory based on Burns' original ideas. This has been the one many of our students have found interesting to reflect upon in their Leadership 1 assessments. According to this theory, transformational leadership can be defined based on the impact that it has on followers. 
Providing a different perspective, Tū Rangatira: Māori Medium Educational Leadership (Ministry of Education, 2010) presents a model of leadership that reflects some of the key leadership roles and practices that contribute to high-quality educational outcomes for Māori learners. It focuses on leadership practices, providing insights into how effective professional development programmes can work towards strengthening leaders’ capabilities, growing capacity and sustaining exemplary leadership in the Māori medium education sector. Its message is not, however, limited only to kura. "Contemporary times call for innovative thinking. This visionary role of leadership entails understanding the past, recognising the present and envisioning the future, to bring about optimal education and life outcomes for learners.” (p.24).
Leadership Styles
Situational leadership (Hersey, Blanchard & Johnson, 1969) is interesting from the perspective of linking theory and style. It suggests that leaders adjust their leadership styles based on the 'readiness' of their followers. Situational leadership theory argues that for leaders to be truly successful, they must adjust the way they lead their teams, to suit two factors:
  • The ‘task maturity’ of the people they are leading (that is, how competent a person or team is at the task at hand)
  • The details of the task 
The Situational leadership model suggests four quadrants. Each quadrant denotes a different leadership style. In situational leadership theory, leaders place more or less emphasis on the task, and more or less emphasis on the empowerment of the people they’re leading, depending on what’s needed to get the job done successfully
(Adapted from Hersey, Blanchard and Johnson, 1969)
In class, complete the University of Kent (2011) online quiz about your typical leadership styles When you have finished record your results and thoughts for later use (Leadership 1 & 2 Assessments).
University of Kent - This online quiz from the University of Kent (UK) will ask you 50 questions about your own styles of leadership tinyurl.com/TMLLeadership(requires Flash)
My results 

University of Kent - This online quiz from the University of Kent (UK) will ask you 50 questions about your own styles of leadership tinyurl.com/TMLLeadership(requires Flash)
Golman’s Leadership Styles – A different view of leadership styles - one of the reasons for including these is that they are in the same sources as the emotional intelligences that we look at later. Also important to note that each list of leadership styles tends to differ somewhat, so we are looking at three examples, Hersey and Blanchard, Goleman and the University of Kent
  • Coercive
  • Authoritative
  • Affiliative
  • Democratic
  • Pacesetting
  • Coaching
Leadership Attributes
There are many personal characteristics that may be identified as aspects of leadership. However it may be helpful to explore some of the attributes identified within various categories that we have introduced on the course previously. These include:
  • Key Competencies (e.g. relating to others)
  • 21st Century Skills (e.g. real-world problem-solving and innovation)
  • Growth Mindset (e.g. resilience)
  • Emotional intelligence (e.g. social skill)

See Daniel Goleman: What makes a leader (video)
Google Training and Emotional Intelligence
Google (n.d.) freely share their New Manager Training Guide, which includes some coverage of the importance of emotional intelligence.
5 Emotional Intelligences
In this session we look at the five emotional intelligences. 
  1. Self-awareness
  2. Self-regulation
  3. Motivation
  4. Empathy
  5. Social skills
See tinyurl.com/TMLEI (Akers & Porter, 2016) for more detail on these intelligences.

Critical Reflection on Leadership 
In-class you will also use a critical reflection framework to consider leadership of previous change initiatives in preparation for the Leadership Assessment 1.See media below. 
Critical Incident reflection 
(Victoria State Government (2007) A 'critical' reflection Framework. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Week 10 - Digital

Agile Teams are Self-Organising Teams Peha’s (2011) version of the 12 principles of the agile manifesto reinterprets the last two as follows: The best ideas and initiatives emerge from self-organizing teams At regular intervals, teams reflect on how to become more effective, then tune and adjust their behavior accordingly We will explore this idea using a combination of Boris Gloger’s Ball Point game (Gloger, 2008) and Mike Rother’s Kata in the Classroom (Rother, 2015).  Kata is a term from martial arts. The Improvement Kata is a repeating routine for continuous improvement.  The following diagram of the improvement kata process is adapted from material on the  katatogrow.com  website. The goal of the ball point game is for each team to get as many balls as possible to pass through the hands of every team member in 2 minutes. The game involves both estimation and self-organisation.  - You have four rounds to iterate...
Post a Comment
Read more

How and Why using the 21st Century Learning Activity of Collaboration can help us enhance our practice

How and Why using the 21st Century Learning Activity of Collaboration can help us enhance our practice ... From: https://app.themindlab.com/media/19751/view Collaboration 21CLD Learning Activity Rubrics - by Microsoft Partners in Learning We made a video to summarise the section on collaboration. Link to our video https://plus.google.com/u/1/113463555525844174967/posts/TKDTgcapmYw
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 31 - Evaluate Your Impacts (Check)

Step 1: What is the observed impact after the ‘Take Action’ phase? As I detailed in last weeks blog post, the result of my pre and post number knowledge testing shows a significant increase in number knowledge when comparing children at the beginning of the year to week 7. However, I think it may be a bit rash to claim that this is entirely down to the application of gamification principles to my class program. I will detail why this is below. In terms of the qualitative interview data I gathered, a number of themes became apparent. Generally, students enjoyed the gamification aspects of the program. One boy stated, "I like the way I can get money for practising my times tables, it makes me want to do it". There did however seem to be a bit of a disconnect between children's mastery of basic number facts, and how readily they use them to solve problems. Step 2: How is the observed impact different from or similar to the anticipated one? As a school, we are having a focus ...
Post a Comment
Read more